your-land/bugtracker
your-land
/
bugtracker
44
20
Code Issues 2.4k Projects 2 Wiki

smalls only have 65 HP #5847

New Issue
Closed
opened 2023-12-27 19:19:18 +00:00 by flux · 10 comments
flux commented 2023-12-27 19:19:18 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

some relevant discussion in #5837, thought this should become its own issue

some relevant discussion in #5837, thought this should become its own issue
👍 1
flux added the
1. kind/bug
3. source/unknown
 labels 2023-12-27 19:19:18 +00:00
flux commented 2023-12-27 19:25:13 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

image

![image](/attachments/e3eb51ab-3428-440b-ad00-2c372be97f6d)
image.png
13 KiB
flux commented 2023-12-27 19:38:28 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

upstream issue for the HP thing:

https://codeberg.org/tenplus1/mobs_redo/issues/6

upstream issue for the HP thing: https://codeberg.org/tenplus1/mobs_redo/issues/6
flux added
3. source/mod upstream
 and removed
3. source/unknown
 labels 2023-12-27 19:38:36 +00:00
flux changed title from foci lack nametags and smalls only have 65 HP to smalls only have 65 HP 2023-12-27 19:38:48 +00:00
AzelfYL commented 2024-01-01 00:47:01 +00:00
Copy Link

This also apparently affects Mediums, given that we killed on that apparently only had 75 HP

This also apparently affects Mediums, given that we killed on that apparently only had 75 HP
rewired_X commented 2024-01-01 00:49:58 +00:00
Copy Link

upstream issue says its been fixed

upstream issue says its been fixed
flux added the
4. step/ready to QA test
 label 2024-01-01 01:47:12 +00:00
flux commented 2024-01-01 01:47:38 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

i haven't tested it myself

i haven't tested it myself
AliasAlreadyTaken added this to the 1.1.123 milestone 2024-01-01 02:39:01 +00:00
AliasAlreadyTaken commented 2024-01-28 13:08:41 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

QA

Looks good, HP are back to where they should

QA Looks good, HP are back to where they should
AliasAlreadyTaken added the
ugh/QA OK
 label 2024-01-28 13:08:45 +00:00
flux added
5. result/fixed
 and removed
4. step/ready to QA test
 labels 2024-03-28 20:11:47 +00:00
flux commented 2024-03-28 20:12:08 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

this is live

this is live
flux closed this issue 2024-03-28 20:12:08 +00:00
DragonWrangler commented 2024-03-29 13:16:52 +00:00
Copy Link

I noticed that the limit for their health is still at 65. This is on the main.

I noticed that the limit for their health is still at 65. This is on the main.
flux commented 2024-03-29 20:51:38 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

I noticed that the limit for their health is still at 65. This is on the main.

i just tested again and micros have a max hp of 150, smalls 200.

image

> I noticed that the limit for their health is still at 65. This is on the main. i just tested again and micros have a max hp of 150, smalls 200. ![image](/attachments/348430fd-68f1-4cf2-9621-ab03a8cd625e)
image.png
194 KiB
AliasAlreadyTaken commented 2024-03-29 21:09:45 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

I tried and found the nomrla landguards have up to 65 HP, the smalls have up to 200

I tried and found the nomrla landguards have up to 65 HP, the smalls have up to 200
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels   
1. kind/balancing

Depends on balancing

  
1. kind/breaking

something that alters or disables an existing game mechanic

  
1. kind/bug

Something is not working

  
1. kind/construction

A build needs fixing

  
1. kind/documentation

Needs proper documentation

  
1. kind/enhancement

New feature

  
1. kind/griefing

players despoiling builds or nature

  
1. kind/invalid

Not a valid report, e.g. created by mistake with no content.

  
1. kind/meme

issue is mostly a joke

  
1. kind/node limit

something which works for or against the node limit

  
1. kind/other

Something not within the other kinds

  
1. kind/protocol

something concerning how staff should react to player requests, or how players should treat each other

  
2. prio/controversial

not likely to happen w/out a lot of discussion

  
2. prio/critical

Very important

  
2. prio/elevated

something players are eager to have fixed

  
2. prio/good first issue

the resolution to this is could be done by a new minetest contributor, who doesn't yet understand the mod ecosystem

  
2. prio/interesting

one of us has real interest in getting this implemented or fixed. however, more research might be needed.

  
2. prio/low

Not so important

  
3. source/art

art needs to be created or found for this to exist. includes sound, 3d modelling, and in-game building.

  
3. source/client

Issue is with the minetest client, or with player client configuration or the technical details of their setup

  
3. source/engine

Issue is due to a bug or feature of the minetest engine

  
3. source/ingame

Problem and solution exist in-game, e.g. builds or player moderation

  
3. source/integration

Two or more nonbuggy mechanics conflict, or our attempts to rectify conflicting mechanics have created a new bug

  
3. source/lag

A problem which is caused or made worse by lag, due to server processing issues, client processing issues, or network issues

  
3. source/license

A licensing problem is involved

  
3. source/mod upstream

Problem is upstream (not engine/client)

  
3. source/unknown

   
3. source/website

Affects the website

  
4. step/approved

Alias has approved this feature, someone should implement it

  
4. step/at work

Being worked on

  
4. step/blocked

we plan to do this, but other work has to be finished first

  
4. step/discussion

issue is under discussion, a solution has not been dictated or agreed upon

  
4. step/help wanted

Need some help

  
4. step/needs confirmation

   
4. step/partially fixed

this is mitigated or partially solved, but more work needs to be done

  
4. step/question

More information is needed

  
4. step/ready to deploy

has been QA tested by another person. has no outstanding issues. might be installed on prod, but needs final testing

  
4. step/ready to QA test

the code is supposedly fixed, but needs to be tested.

  
4. step/want approval

Someone can quickly implement this if Alias approves the change/feature

  
5. result/cannot reproduce

   
5. result/duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
5. result/fixed

problem is fixed

  
5. result/maybe

not planned currently, but maybe some day

  
5. result/wontfix

the reported issue won't be changed, whether it's intentional or not.

  
ugh/petz

yet another petz bugz.

  
ugh/QA main

That's something we can only wait and see whether it hapens again: On the main server

  
ugh/QA NOK

Fix didn't yield the expected results

  
ugh/QA OK

tested

No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
ugh/petz
ugh/QA main
ugh/QA NOK
ugh/QA OK
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
1.1.123
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
5 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: your-land/bugtracker#5847
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?