your-land/bugtracker
your-land
/
bugtracker
44
20
Code Issues 2.5k Projects 2 Wiki

various fruit are in group:leafdecay, and thus can be crafted into trunks:twig_1 #1992

New Issue
Closed
opened 2022-05-27 19:07:03 +00:00 by flux · 7 comments
flux commented 2022-05-27 19:07:03 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

which is weird.

  1. fruit should fall when the tree is cut down
  2. fruit should not be craftable into twigs, as that can conflict w/ existing or plausible recipes, e.g. ethereal:banana_bunch

affected fruit:

  • default:apple
  • ethereal:banana
  • ethereal:banana_bunch
  • ethereal:coconut
  • ethereal:golden_apple
  • ethereal:lemon
  • ethereal:olive
  • ethereal:orange
  • moretrees:acorn
  • moretrees:cedar_cone
  • moretrees:fir_cone
  • moretrees:spruce_cone

I think the solution to this should just be to remove that crafting recipe? There's other ways to craft that twig.

which is weird. 1. fruit should fall when the tree is cut down 2. fruit should not be craftable into twigs, as that can conflict w/ existing or plausible recipes, e.g. `ethereal:banana_bunch` affected fruit: * `default:apple` * `ethereal:banana` * `ethereal:banana_bunch` * `ethereal:coconut` * `ethereal:golden_apple` * `ethereal:lemon` * `ethereal:olive` * `ethereal:orange` * `moretrees:acorn` * `moretrees:cedar_cone` * `moretrees:fir_cone` * `moretrees:spruce_cone` I think the solution to this should just be to remove that crafting recipe? There's other ways to craft that twig.
flux added the
1. kind/bug
3. source/integration
4. step/want approval
 labels 2022-05-27 19:07:03 +00:00
flux commented 2022-05-27 19:10:17 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

Or possibly, fruit should be put in "group:falling" and removed from leafdecay?

Or possibly, fruit should be put in "group:falling" and removed from leafdecay?
flux commented 2022-06-12 16:02:50 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

per #2066, fruit doesn't even fall currently when the tree is cut down via treecutting...

per #2066, fruit doesn't even fall currently when the tree is cut down via treecutting...
AliasAlreadyTaken commented 2022-06-16 01:35:05 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

group:falling sounds more reasonable. leafdecay is yet another special mechanic from plantlife (or moretrees??), which noone else uses (and thus is not expected).

group:falling sounds more reasonable. leafdecay is yet another special mechanic from plantlife (or moretrees??), which noone else uses (and thus is not expected).
AliasAlreadyTaken added the
4. step/approved
 label 2022-06-16 01:35:12 +00:00
flux self-assigned this 2022-06-16 02:18:16 +00:00
flux commented 2022-06-16 16:52:09 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

hm. i still like the group:falling_node idea, but it doesn't resolve the issue in #2066 when using the electrumese axe.

also, because the various fruits are not walkable, when they fall on the ground, they don't stack, so you lose a lot of your crop.

hm. i still like the `group:falling_node` idea, but it doesn't resolve the issue in #2066 when using the electrumese axe. also, because the various fruits are not `walkable`, when they fall on the ground, they don't stack, so you lose a lot of your crop. ![](https://gitea.your-land.de/attachments/a8cfaf32-13b3-4361-a8bb-a1e4f172ea14)
screenshot_20220616_094930.png
1.6 MiB
flux added
4. step/at work
 and removed
4. step/want approval
 labels 2022-06-16 16:53:19 +00:00
flux commented 2022-06-16 18:38:21 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

fixed the electrumese axe via 2ff95735f9

fixed the electrumese axe via https://gitea.your-land.de/your-land/yl_nether/commit/2ff95735f902fb738171148017473adc2368e529
flux commented 2022-06-16 19:44:03 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

implemented in c8ec25e786

implemented in https://gitea.your-land.de/your-land/yl_commons/commit/c8ec25e786f7df177f70d23534c981cc177d8f88
flux added
4. step/ready to QA test
 and removed
4. step/at work
 labels 2022-06-16 19:45:12 +00:00
AliasAlreadyTaken added this to the 1.1.113 milestone 2022-06-17 23:05:11 +00:00
flux added
5. result/fixed
 and removed
4. step/approved
4. step/ready to QA test
 labels 2022-06-22 15:42:20 +00:00
flux commented 2022-06-22 15:42:26 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

live

live
flux closed this issue 2022-06-22 15:42:26 +00:00
flux removed their assignment 2022-09-21 00:02:26 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels   
1. kind/balancing

Depends on balancing

  
1. kind/breaking

something that alters or disables an existing game mechanic

  
1. kind/bug

Something is not working

  
1. kind/construction

A build needs fixing

  
1. kind/documentation

Needs proper documentation

  
1. kind/enhancement

New feature

  
1. kind/griefing

players despoiling builds or nature

  
1. kind/invalid

Not a valid report, e.g. created by mistake with no content.

  
1. kind/meme

issue is mostly a joke

  
1. kind/node limit

something which works for or against the node limit

  
1. kind/other

Something not within the other kinds

  
1. kind/protocol

something concerning how staff should react to player requests, or how players should treat each other

  
2. prio/controversial

not likely to happen w/out a lot of discussion

  
2. prio/critical

Very important

  
2. prio/elevated

something players are eager to have fixed

  
2. prio/good first issue

the resolution to this is could be done by a new minetest contributor, who doesn't yet understand the mod ecosystem

  
2. prio/interesting

one of us has real interest in getting this implemented or fixed. however, more research might be needed.

  
2. prio/low

Not so important

  
3. source/art

art needs to be created or found for this to exist. includes sound, 3d modelling, and in-game building.

  
3. source/client

Issue is with the minetest client, or with player client configuration or the technical details of their setup

  
3. source/engine

Issue is due to a bug or feature of the minetest engine

  
3. source/ingame

Problem and solution exist in-game, e.g. builds or player moderation

  
3. source/integration

Two or more nonbuggy mechanics conflict, or our attempts to rectify conflicting mechanics have created a new bug

  
3. source/lag

A problem which is caused or made worse by lag, due to server processing issues, client processing issues, or network issues

  
3. source/license

A licensing problem is involved

  
3. source/mod upstream

Problem is upstream (not engine/client)

  
3. source/unknown

   
3. source/website

Affects the website

  
4. step/approved

Alias has approved this feature, someone should implement it

  
4. step/at work

Being worked on

  
4. step/blocked

we plan to do this, but other work has to be finished first

  
4. step/discussion

issue is under discussion, a solution has not been dictated or agreed upon

  
4. step/help wanted

Need some help

  
4. step/needs confirmation

   
4. step/partially fixed

this is mitigated or partially solved, but more work needs to be done

  
4. step/question

More information is needed

  
4. step/ready to deploy

has been QA tested by another person. has no outstanding issues. might be installed on prod, but needs final testing

  
4. step/ready to QA test

the code is supposedly fixed, but needs to be tested.

  
4. step/want approval

Someone can quickly implement this if Alias approves the change/feature

  
5. result/cannot reproduce

   
5. result/duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
5. result/fixed

problem is fixed

  
5. result/maybe

not planned currently, but maybe some day

  
5. result/wontfix

the reported issue won't be changed, whether it's intentional or not.

  
ugh/petz

yet another petz bugz.

  
ugh/QA main

That's something we can only wait and see whether it hapens again: On the main server

  
ugh/QA NOK

Fix didn't yield the expected results

  
ugh/QA OK

tested

No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
ugh/petz
ugh/QA main
ugh/QA NOK
ugh/QA OK
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
1.1.113
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: your-land/bugtracker#1992
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?