A vicious circle in the faq ... #5945
Labels
No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
ugh/petz
ugh/QA main
ugh/QA NOK
ugh/QA OK
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: your-land/bugtracker#5945
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
... when I type
/faq_list
(before there were to many entries, look #5708 ) there is a keyword "book". If I do:/faq book
the answer will be:book not found. Possible keywords for book: new library copy book
Same with
/faq staff
and/faq copy
.I think it's related to this entry, for example: Q:
How do I publish a book to the Haven library?
A:Find the mailbox right outside the public library and throw in your book. Don’t forget to make yourself a copy first!
Same with
/faq purple
and/faq chest
.That's most likely because "copy book" and "purple chest" are compound keywords, that's not so easy to see when everything is just a space character to separate them.
Should we make it like this?
Ah, now I understand. There was and is no searchword
book
, but the searchwordcopy book
. In/faq_list
,copy
andbook
were displayed like all other terms. So how could you have guessed that. It's a good thing that this has been cleared up so easily and that there is no vicious circle. The comma solution would certainly help.However, before there are more compound searchwords, the basic keywords should always be set first. I'll make up for that for the above words in the next few days. However, I don't see such a great need for compound searchwords either. Who is supposed to remember them and then enter them correctly and quickly if the need arises? I won't see it until our FAQ has grown tremendously and has a nice GUI that makes it easier to handle.