Jammy reports: perhaps make the pebbles minea ... #5880
Labels
No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
ugh/petz
ugh/QA main
ugh/QA NOK
ugh/QA OK
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
6 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: your-land/bugtracker#5880
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Jammy reports a bug:
Player position:
Player look:
Player information:
Player meta:
Log identifier
Profiler save:
Status:
Teleport command:
Compass command:
honestly, that's a reasonable proposal. i've played some minecraft modpacks where you had to initially get stone in such a way.
Astonishing. I agree :D
The RealTest game also uses loose stones for the first tools.
It's a nice idea. But not very urgent. Here in YL, we use stones as nice decoration. They have about zero value as materials for first tools. Even if cobble were not as plentiful as it is, people would soon run out of reachable surface with new pebbles on.
i tested my addition in singleplayer and pebbles break instantly. is it good?
It's half the issue :3
Now the problem how to integrate it into yl XD
Either you try to do it "upstream": i.e. do a pull request to here: https://github.com/mt-mods/plantlife_modpack
Or, we have yl_commons mod with functions to modify/override stuff...
ill try upstream first and if they turn it down, then we override
this is the sort of change that should probably be an integration issue (i.e. yl_commons). if we want to PR/request upstream, it needs to be optional - i.e., a setting that defaults to the current behavior.
somehow upstream actually got merged
please give us a linkseems to be
5a8794cd84
?? correct this if i'm wrong.it's that commit yes