DragonWrangler1 reports: I accidently killed my pink ha ... #5502
Labels
No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
ugh/petz
ugh/QA main
ugh/QA NOK
ugh/QA OK
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: your-land/bugtracker#5502
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
DragonWrangler1 reports a bug:
Player position:
Player look:
Player information:
Player meta:
Log identifier
Profiler save:
Status:
Teleport command:
Compass command:
It's not the explosion that kills the animal. Every owner can punch their own animal and the animal takes damage from the punch.
The shot of the electrumese sword damages ("punches" in MT terms) the animal, like when someone used a sword directly
cf. #5329. petz currently don't define any special on_blast logic, so any explosion will likely kill them. however, given that our tnt explosions have an "owner", it should be possible to make sure other players can't kill your petz w/ the electrumese sword.
but in any event, the player killed their own petz, which should be allowed, so no refund.
i'm confused. You refunded the petz from this issue
#2907
but you can't refund my pink hampster ?
The question at hand is "should a player, by missclick or otherwise, be able to kill his own pet?"
If YL says "No, when a pet is equipped with a dreamcatcher, then it is a clear sign by the user he wants to keep it, it is not scheduled for slaughter like ducks or chickens or other farm animal"
I'd favour this position, but it may have other, conflicting mecahnics.
The explosions did not manage to kill a pet with a dreamcatcher. I tested both TNT and the electrumese sword missile.
in that case, it was due to a bug in the client UI, which is outside the ability of the player or us to fix.