Ravise reports: one can still receive /mail fr ... #5480
Labels
No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
ugh/petz
ugh/QA main
ugh/QA NOK
ugh/QA OK
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: your-land/bugtracker#5480
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Ravise reports a bug:
Player position:
Player look:
Player information:
Player meta:
Log identifier
Profiler save:
Status:
Teleport command:
Compass command:
implemented
33d3dfe175
note that the sender can tell that their message was ignored because the recipient's name will be removed in the copy of the message in their outbox.
QA
This may be used to determine whether someone ignores me or not. Any way we can prevent that?
AliasAlreadyTaken: wouldn't it be better for someone to know they have been ignored and stop trying to contact the person that ignored them, rather than wonder if they are ignored and keep trying to contact the person ?
No. If one person ignores another, then there must be no way to tell that they were ignored and no way for them to contact their target. Ignoring someone is not something you do out of spite or because a person made a joke you didn't like. Ignoring is ultima ratio when you do not want anything to do with someone and all other ways of resolving have failed.
They should have no way to tell - else they could simply make themselves a new account to go around the ignore and pester their target again. Imagine someone feels really uncomfortable with someone else, but it's not enough to report them.
i've re-implemented this so that the sender cannot tell that the other party didn't receive the message:
4d6bf79ced
note that this is very brittle, as it has to copy a large chunk of code from the mail mod, and the internals of that mod seem to change regularly...
Should we probably ask upstream to expose a way to intercept mails? Should be the same place like #5162
QA
feature works (and doesn't appear to be brittle)
i don't want to propose a solution to this, or other mail mod issues, because i feel like the current architecture of the mail mod is infeasible. and, i don't want to commit my time to fixing it. i don't even want to commit my time to teaching the current maintainers how to fix it, but perhaps i should at least open an issue w/ suggestions....
basically, i think the mail mod maintainers need to study the development of email
this is live