JAIL REASON #4838

Open
opened 2023-06-24 19:55:59 +00:00 by daydream · 7 comments
Member

*We need to structure the /jail command so that a reason is required to complete the action. There is no rush because you can jail someone whether they're online or not, unlike most commands - so while doing it quickly is often times fels like a serious need, you in fact do have a few seconds to write a reason.

This would mean months later when the player returns staff can evaluate what the next move should be - which involves going into jail chat and asking them to explain how the reasons they're in jail aren't going to happen anymore or they start with bans (day/week/month/year/perm) whatever is needed.

We can't ask if someone has learned a lesson and then not know what the lesson was supposed to be.... well we can but I'd rather know what went wrong.*

*We need to structure the /jail command so that a reason is required to complete the action. There is no rush because you can jail someone whether they're online or not, unlike most commands - so while doing it quickly is often times fels like a serious need, you in fact do have a few seconds to write a reason. This would mean months later when the player returns staff can evaluate what the next move should be - which involves going into jail chat and asking them to explain how the reasons they're in jail aren't going to happen anymore or they start with bans (day/week/month/year/perm) whatever is needed. We can't ask if someone has learned a lesson and then not know what the lesson was supposed to be.... well we can but I'd rather know what went wrong.*
Member

Or, if someone goes to jail, a /report will automatically open here. Here are the names of the two participants, as well as a time stamp. Then you can write a few lines, perhaps with the first results of a conversation.

Or, if someone goes to jail, a /report will automatically open here. Here are the names of the two participants, as well as a time stamp. Then you can write a few lines, perhaps with the first results of a conversation.
AliasAlreadyTaken added the
1. kind/enhancement
label 2023-06-24 22:00:53 +00:00
AliasAlreadyTaken added this to the Alias@work project 2023-06-24 22:00:58 +00:00
Member

verbana expects a reason when banning someone or otherwise changing their status, though it can be omitted. people were pretty good about recording why something happened on bls, though.

verbana expects a reason when banning someone or otherwise changing their status, though it can be omitted. people were pretty good about recording *why* something happened on bls, though.

Duplicate of #3323 takeaway9. But since there is no proper documentation there:

  • Split the jail into a quick /j NAME and a /jail NAME REASON
  • Record REASON, NAME and the person who jailed in the log
  • Discuss: Should both jail commands send a webhook message to the discord moderation channel?
  • Discuss: Should both jail commands create an automatic report?
  • yl_tags will allow staff to store information on players, should the /jail command tie in with that?
Duplicate of #3323 takeaway9. But since there is no proper documentation there: * [ ] Split the jail into a quick /j NAME and a /jail NAME REASON * [ ] Record REASON, NAME and the person who jailed in the log * [ ] Discuss: Should both jail commands send a webhook message to the discord moderation channel? * [ ] Discuss: Should both jail commands create an automatic report? * [ ] yl_tags will allow staff to store information on players, should the /jail command tie in with that?
Member

/j can be just an alias for /jail.
REASON can be optional argument.
Doing quick /j NAME and after that /jail NAME REASON could just append the reason to the record/log.

`/j` can be just an alias for `/jail`. `REASON` can be optional argument. Doing quick `/j NAME` and after that `/jail NAME REASON` could just append the reason to the record/log.

With the introduction of tags, what should we do with this issue? Do tags suffice?

With the introduction of tags, what should we do with this issue? Do tags suffice?
AliasAlreadyTaken removed this from the Alias@work project 2024-03-13 14:28:39 +00:00
Member

For me tags would be ok for documentation of the longtime jail reason.

For me tags would be ok for documentation of the longtime jail reason.

IMO tags are good.

IMO tags are good.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
6 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: your-land/bugtracker#4838
No description provided.