Azelf reports: Pet Scorpions are unable to be ... #4032
Labels
No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
ugh/petz
ugh/QA main
ugh/QA NOK
ugh/QA OK
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
6 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: your-land/bugtracker#4032
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Azelf reports a bug:
Player position:
Player look:
Player information:
Player meta:
Log identifier
Profiler save:
Status:
Teleport command:
Compass command:
Even if we wanted to do that: Once animals are protected FROM a damage source, they cannot deal damage TO that source as well.
i'm against this. scorpions are a way for a player to create their own personal army. a player can get them to attack another player. it wouldn't be reasonable if the player couldn't defend themselves.
Not everyone wants these cute pet scorpions as guards. Pets that are so difficult to obtain and then can die easily to players who just don't know that they're pets are a problem.
Players who do know to get one or more pet scorpions do know how to protect their property from other players and don't need scorpions for that.
maybe we should make scorpions obey PvP rules? basically, assume all damage to/from the scorpion is associated w/ the owner of the scorpion? this way, most damage to/from players is disabled, but it's still possible if both the scorpion owner and victim have PvP enabled.
"Minions need to obey pvp rules" is a planned mechanics when warriors get to hire armies and other classes can summon companions.
Still: What can deal damage must be able to receive damage.
Since #6415 was closed, I will mention this here:
Name tags don't work on pet scorpions, but probably should.
Ups, I must have overread that the nametag thingy was not in here. There is no harm (or worse, balancing) involved in using the nametag.
I'm very very certain they used to work on scorpions. I have multiple scorpions that I own that are name tagged and so does DD.
Oh... I somehow forgot we have nametags in general still broken on main...
I think they will work again after the update :)
see #5837
If you add a #, the issue gets linked automatically ;)
the easiest way to do this is to just make the "puncher" be the player and not the mob itself, but that doesn't work so well if the player isn't logged in... but perhaps tamed mobs shouldn't do damage if their owner isn't logged in?
scorpions do make use of the
feed_tame
callback, which is what handles applying nametags, for whatever reason.apparently you can also put saddles on the pet scorpions and ride them?!
Making the player the puncher would yield xp for the player in afk settings among other things. Guardians of a place should still defend it even when the owner is not logged in.