your-land/bugtracker
your-land
/
bugtracker
45
21
Code Issues 2.5k Projects 2 Wiki

tubbo reports: add a feature where you can, M ... #1685

New Issue
Open
opened 2022-04-04 16:54:47 +00:00 by yourland-report · 12 comments
yourland-report commented 2022-04-04 16:54:47 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

tubbo reports a bug:

add a feature where you can, Melt tools for half the ingots back like rainbow sword etc. gives back 1 ingot

Player position:

{
	y = 77.5,
	x = 3240.0368652344,
	z = 440.69100952148
}

Player look:

{
	y = -0.54463905096054,
	x = -0.22285482287407,
	z = -0.80851966142654
}

Player information:

{
	min_rtt = 0.020999999716878,
	max_rtt = 0.30700001120567,
	connection_uptime = 1125,
	max_jitter = 0.28500002622604,
	minor = 4,
	major = 5,
	ip_version = 6,
	formspec_version = 4,
	patch = 2,
	protocol_version = 39,
	serialization_version = 28,
	lang_code = "",
	version_string = "5.4.2",
	avg_rtt = 0.024000000208616,
	state = "Active",
	avg_jitter = 0.0020000003278255,
	min_jitter = 0
}

Player meta:

{
	fields = {
		["3d_armor_inventory"] = "return {\"\", \"3d_armor:enchanted_helmet_mithril_strong 1 41782\", \"shields:shield_rainbow 1 4504\", \"3d_armor:enchanted_chestplate_mithril_strong 1 47696\", \"3d_armor:boots_crystal 1 20874\", \"3d_armor:leggings_crystal 1 50710\"}",
		yl_commons_thankyou = "16",
		jointime = "1644577647",
		["stamina:poisoned"] = "no",
		["stamina:exhaustion"] = "114.5",
		["signslib:pos"] = "(3243,77,514)",
		digged_nodes = "38495",
		bitten = "0",
		["unified_inventory:bags"] = "return {\"unified_inventory:bag_medium\", \"unified_inventory:bag_small\", \"unified_inventory:bag_large\", \"unified_inventory:bag_large\"}",
		partychat = "party",
		yl_church = "return {[\"last_death\"] = {[\"y\"] = 79, [\"x\"] = 3231, [\"z\"] = 543}, [\"last_death_portal\"] = 1648923565}",
		died = "79",
		["stamina:level"] = "9",
		punch_count = "803",
		arenalib_infobox_arenaID = "0",
		inflicted_damage = "14020",
		crafted = "948",
		played_time = "641859",
		xp = "41900",
		yl_commons_player_joined = "1649090201",
		placed_nodes = "36060",
		hud_state = "on",
		repellant = "0",
		yl_commons_player_created = "1644577647"
	}
}

Log identifier


[MOD] yl_report log identifier = Yspg3PMD4pBz0xsZIJbRBVU94cgtBwAj

Profiler save:

profile-20220404T185447.json_prettyEE

Status:

# Server: version: 5.5.0-yl | game: Minetest Game | uptime: 1d 5h 51min 18s | max lag: 3.57s | clients: Diaeresis, Chache, tubbo, LOR, AliasAlreadyTaken, debiankaios, Sparkles, Bla, Aleks555, drgn, Boot, bakaxtreme, shanish2, GrimPixel, guestxmart, shanish, flux, Bailiff

Teleport command:

/teleport xyz 3240 78 441

Compass command:

/give_compass Construction Yspg3PMD4pBz0xsZIJbRBVU94cgtBwAj D2691E 3240 78 441
tubbo reports a bug: > add a feature where you can, Melt tools for half the ingots back like rainbow sword etc. gives back 1 ingot Player position: ``` { y = 77.5, x = 3240.0368652344, z = 440.69100952148 } ``` Player look: ``` { y = -0.54463905096054, x = -0.22285482287407, z = -0.80851966142654 } ``` Player information: ``` { min_rtt = 0.020999999716878, max_rtt = 0.30700001120567, connection_uptime = 1125, max_jitter = 0.28500002622604, minor = 4, major = 5, ip_version = 6, formspec_version = 4, patch = 2, protocol_version = 39, serialization_version = 28, lang_code = "", version_string = "5.4.2", avg_rtt = 0.024000000208616, state = "Active", avg_jitter = 0.0020000003278255, min_jitter = 0 } ``` Player meta: ``` { fields = { ["3d_armor_inventory"] = "return {\"\", \"3d_armor:enchanted_helmet_mithril_strong 1 41782\", \"shields:shield_rainbow 1 4504\", \"3d_armor:enchanted_chestplate_mithril_strong 1 47696\", \"3d_armor:boots_crystal 1 20874\", \"3d_armor:leggings_crystal 1 50710\"}", yl_commons_thankyou = "16", jointime = "1644577647", ["stamina:poisoned"] = "no", ["stamina:exhaustion"] = "114.5", ["signslib:pos"] = "(3243,77,514)", digged_nodes = "38495", bitten = "0", ["unified_inventory:bags"] = "return {\"unified_inventory:bag_medium\", \"unified_inventory:bag_small\", \"unified_inventory:bag_large\", \"unified_inventory:bag_large\"}", partychat = "party", yl_church = "return {[\"last_death\"] = {[\"y\"] = 79, [\"x\"] = 3231, [\"z\"] = 543}, [\"last_death_portal\"] = 1648923565}", died = "79", ["stamina:level"] = "9", punch_count = "803", arenalib_infobox_arenaID = "0", inflicted_damage = "14020", crafted = "948", played_time = "641859", xp = "41900", yl_commons_player_joined = "1649090201", placed_nodes = "36060", hud_state = "on", repellant = "0", yl_commons_player_created = "1644577647" } } ``` Log identifier ``` [MOD] yl_report log identifier = Yspg3PMD4pBz0xsZIJbRBVU94cgtBwAj ``` Profiler save: ``` profile-20220404T185447.json_prettyEE ``` Status: ``` # Server: version: 5.5.0-yl | game: Minetest Game | uptime: 1d 5h 51min 18s | max lag: 3.57s | clients: Diaeresis, Chache, tubbo, LOR, AliasAlreadyTaken, debiankaios, Sparkles, Bla, Aleks555, drgn, Boot, bakaxtreme, shanish2, GrimPixel, guestxmart, shanish, flux, Bailiff ``` Teleport command: ``` /teleport xyz 3240 78 441 ``` Compass command: ``` /give_compass Construction Yspg3PMD4pBz0xsZIJbRBVU94cgtBwAj D2691E 3240 78 441 ```
👍 3
AliasAlreadyTaken was assigned by yourland-report 2022-04-04 16:54:47 +00:00
AliasAlreadyTaken added the
1. kind/enhancement
 label 2022-04-04 18:30:27 +00:00
flux commented 2022-04-04 21:19:04 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

i support some sort of feature like this.

i support some sort of feature like this.
👍 2
flux added the
4. step/want approval
 label 2022-04-05 02:31:03 +00:00
flux commented 2022-04-07 18:18:49 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

This issue is a generalization of #1252

This issue is a generalization of #1252
AliasAlreadyTaken commented 2022-04-16 03:21:35 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

Sounds like an interesting idea.

May conflict later with the planned repair mechanics.

Sounds like an interesting idea. May conflict later with the planned repair mechanics.
flux added this to the flux's TODO list project 2022-07-02 20:31:42 +00:00
flux added the
2. prio/elevated
 label 2022-07-28 19:06:43 +00:00
AliasAlreadyTaken added the
1. kind/balancing
 label 2022-07-29 18:00:27 +00:00
flux commented 2023-01-01 19:28:51 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

adding some keywords here to make this easier to search for:

smelting smelt recycle recycling uncraft uncrafting decraft decrafting

adding some keywords here to make this easier to search for: smelting smelt recycle recycling uncraft uncrafting decraft decrafting
sherkhan30452 commented 2023-01-05 06:42:34 +00:00
Copy Link

I don't if this is exactly what people want but I found this mod

Decraft

De-craft items with the decrafting workbench.

https://content.minetest.net/packages/cool_beans/decraft/?protocol_version=41

I don't if this is exactly what people want but I found this mod ### Decraft De-craft items with the decrafting workbench. https://content.minetest.net/packages/cool_beans/decraft/?protocol_version=41 ![](https://content.minetest.net/uploads/302fed8469.png) ![](https://content.minetest.net/uploads/11f0ce9f9b.png) ![](https://content.minetest.net/uploads/a0d98054c3.png)
flux commented 2023-01-05 18:25:29 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

i don't think we want a generic un-crafting mechanism. also, i'm wondering about how that would ever work for items w/ multiple recipes, or whose recipes use groups.

i don't think we want a generic un-crafting mechanism. also, i'm wondering about how that would ever work for items w/ multiple recipes, or whose recipes use groups.
Boot commented 2023-01-05 18:31:05 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

i don't think we want a generic un-crafting mechanism.

But may be a melting furnace to get back all metals?

> i don't think we want a generic un-crafting mechanism. But may be a melting furnace to get back all metals?
👍 2
Sokomine commented 2023-01-05 20:03:19 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

But may be a melting furnace to get back all metals?

Sounds good and logical. Metals can easily be reclaimed, while getting wood back from a used tool (or even paper) is likely to fail. Also seperating a baked bread back into its indigrents may be...intresting, to say the least :-)

Still, even that will need some balancing. Nether ingots could then be obtained from tools, which are more frequent than the ingots needed for armor? I wouldn't mind if players could get nether armor with more reasonable effort.

Diffrent repair mechanisms will require a re-balancing of all tools and armor anyway...

> But may be a melting furnace to get back all metals? Sounds good and logical. Metals can easily be reclaimed, while getting wood back from a used tool (or even paper) is likely to fail. Also seperating a baked bread back into its indigrents may be...intresting, to say the least :-) Still, even that will need some balancing. Nether ingots could then be obtained from tools, which are more frequent than the ingots needed for armor? I wouldn't mind if players could get nether armor with more reasonable effort. Diffrent repair mechanisms will require a re-balancing of all tools and armor anyway...
Jammy commented 2024-03-11 09:57:32 +00:00
Copy Link

That causes nether ingots to become much less valuable.
Also, for items having multiple recipes, how is the un-crafter supposed to work? Wouldn't it make wacky and unbalanced things possible, such as being able to create sherlocks with a mese crystal?

That causes nether ingots to become much less valuable. Also, for items having multiple recipes, how is the un-crafter supposed to work? Wouldn't it make wacky and unbalanced things possible, such as being able to create sherlocks with a mese crystal?
flux commented 2024-03-11 21:03:04 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

how is the un-crafter supposed to work?

it's been proposed and turned down several times. we aren't doing that.

> how is the un-crafter supposed to work? it's been proposed and turned down several times. we aren't doing that.
AliasAlreadyTaken added the
5. result/wontfix
 label 2024-03-12 01:27:08 +00:00
flux commented 2024-03-12 20:28:51 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

this issue isn't about the uncrafter, it's about smelting metal tools to reclaim (some) of the materials that were used to craft them. i didn't mean to imply that this should be closed, though perhaps it can be. it's been years.

this issue isn't about the uncrafter, it's about smelting metal tools to reclaim (some) of the materials that were used to craft them. i didn't mean to imply that this should be closed, though perhaps it can be. it's been years.
👍 1
flux commented 2024-04-02 02:05:59 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

reopening the discussion about smelting tools to regain some of the metal used to craft them

reopening the discussion about smelting tools to regain some of the metal used to craft them
flux reopened this issue 2024-04-02 02:05:59 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels   
1. kind/balancing

Depends on balancing

  
1. kind/breaking

something that alters or disables an existing game mechanic

  
1. kind/bug

Something is not working

  
1. kind/construction

A build needs fixing

  
1. kind/documentation

Needs proper documentation

  
1. kind/enhancement

New feature

  
1. kind/griefing

players despoiling builds or nature

  
1. kind/invalid

Not a valid report, e.g. created by mistake with no content.

  
1. kind/meme

issue is mostly a joke

  
1. kind/node limit

something which works for or against the node limit

  
1. kind/other

Something not within the other kinds

  
1. kind/protocol

something concerning how staff should react to player requests, or how players should treat each other

  
2. prio/controversial

not likely to happen w/out a lot of discussion

  
2. prio/critical

Very important

  
2. prio/elevated

something players are eager to have fixed

  
2. prio/good first issue

the resolution to this is could be done by a new minetest contributor, who doesn't yet understand the mod ecosystem

  
2. prio/interesting

one of us has real interest in getting this implemented or fixed. however, more research might be needed.

  
2. prio/low

Not so important

  
3. source/art

art needs to be created or found for this to exist. includes sound, 3d modelling, and in-game building.

  
3. source/client

Issue is with the minetest client, or with player client configuration or the technical details of their setup

  
3. source/engine

Issue is due to a bug or feature of the minetest engine

  
3. source/ingame

Problem and solution exist in-game, e.g. builds or player moderation

  
3. source/integration

Two or more nonbuggy mechanics conflict, or our attempts to rectify conflicting mechanics have created a new bug

  
3. source/lag

A problem which is caused or made worse by lag, due to server processing issues, client processing issues, or network issues

  
3. source/license

A licensing problem is involved

  
3. source/mod upstream

Problem is upstream (not engine/client)

  
3. source/unknown

   
3. source/website

Affects the website

  
4. step/approved

Alias has approved this feature, someone should implement it

  
4. step/at work

Being worked on

  
4. step/blocked

we plan to do this, but other work has to be finished first

  
4. step/discussion

issue is under discussion, a solution has not been dictated or agreed upon

  
4. step/help wanted

Need some help

  
4. step/needs confirmation

   
4. step/partially fixed

this is mitigated or partially solved, but more work needs to be done

  
4. step/question

More information is needed

  
4. step/ready to deploy

has been QA tested by another person. has no outstanding issues. might be installed on prod, but needs final testing

  
4. step/ready to QA test

the code is supposedly fixed, but needs to be tested.

  
4. step/want approval

Someone can quickly implement this if Alias approves the change/feature

  
5. result/cannot reproduce

   
5. result/duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
5. result/fixed

problem is fixed

  
5. result/maybe

not planned currently, but maybe some day

  
5. result/wontfix

the reported issue won't be changed, whether it's intentional or not.

  
ugh/petz

yet another petz bugz.

  
ugh/QA main

That's something we can only wait and see whether it hapens again: On the main server

  
ugh/QA NOK

Fix didn't yield the expected results

  
ugh/QA OK

tested

No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
ugh/petz
ugh/QA main
ugh/QA NOK
ugh/QA OK
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
flux's TODO list
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
AliasAlreadyTaken
7 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: your-land/bugtracker#1685
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?