your-land/bugtracker
your-land/bugtracker
41
22
Issues 3.6k Projects 4 Wiki

Chopping of trees gives no XP ... #8658

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-06-15 10:24:07 +02:00 by Boot · 3 comments
Boot commented 2025-06-15 10:24:07 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

... but costs hunger points. So even one (some) XP for one hunger point should be fair enough, especially when compared to the completely overvalued digging.

... but costs hunger points. So even one (some) XP for one hunger point should be fair enough, especially when compared to the completely overvalued digging.
AliasAlreadyTaken was assigned by Boot 2025-06-15 10:24:15 +02:00
daydream commented 2025-06-18 11:12:33 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

Players would abuse choppy and decimate forests for XP so I can understand removing XP from choppy but to balance that, we shouldn't starve to death while using it either - fair is fair and this was not balanced properly when it was done.

Players would abuse choppy and decimate forests for XP so I can understand removing XP from choppy but to balance that, we shouldn't starve to death while using it either - fair is fair and this was not balanced properly when it was done.
Boot commented 2025-06-18 13:41:16 +02:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

Some time after choppy came, it had suddenly brought enormous XP by bug. Of course, this had to be stopped at short notice at the time. But the fact that there should be no XP at all is too violent. I think that if you link the XP directly to the hunger points, then you only get a few XP for 5 minutes of choppy, while you have to constantly replenish your hunger points, i.e. even interrupt the choppy, which is not so very worthwhile for XP grinding after all.

Some time after choppy came, it had suddenly brought enormous XP by bug. Of course, this had to be stopped at short notice at the time. But the fact that there should be no XP at all is too violent. I think that if you link the XP directly to the hunger points, then you only get a few XP for 5 minutes of choppy, while you have to constantly replenish your hunger points, i.e. even interrupt the choppy, which is not so very worthwhile for XP grinding after all.
AliasAlreadyTaken commented 2025-07-26 16:50:47 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

Choppy is considered an afk mechanic, those cannot yield xp

Choppy is considered an afk mechanic, those cannot yield xp
AliasAlreadyTaken added the
1. kind/enhancement
2. prio/controversial
 labels 2025-07-26 16:50:58 +02:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels   
1. kind/balancing

Depends on balancing

  
1. kind/breaking

something that alters or disables an existing game mechanic

  
1. kind/bug

Something is not working

  
1. kind/construction

A build needs fixing

  
1. kind/documentation

Needs proper documentation

  
1. kind/enhancement

New feature

  
1. kind/griefing

players despoiling builds or nature

  
1. kind/invalid

Not a valid report, e.g. created by mistake with no content.

  
1. kind/meme

issue is mostly a joke

  
1. kind/node limit

something which works for or against the node limit

  
1. kind/other

Something not within the other kinds

  
1. kind/protocol

something concerning how staff should react to player requests, or how players should treat each other

  
2. prio/controversial

not likely to happen w/out a lot of discussion

  
2. prio/critical

Very important

  
2. prio/elevated

something players are eager to have fixed

  
2. prio/good first issue

the resolution to this is could be done by a new minetest contributor, who doesn't yet understand the mod ecosystem

  
2. prio/interesting

one of us has real interest in getting this implemented or fixed. however, more research might be needed.

  
2. prio/low

Not so important

  
3. source/art

art needs to be created or found for this to exist. includes sound, 3d modelling, and in-game building.

  
3. source/client

Issue is with the minetest client, or with player client configuration or the technical details of their setup

  
3. source/engine

Issue is due to a bug or feature of the minetest engine

  
3. source/ingame

Problem and solution exist in-game, e.g. builds or player moderation

  
3. source/integration

Two or more nonbuggy mechanics conflict, or our attempts to rectify conflicting mechanics have created a new bug

  
3. source/lag

A problem which is caused or made worse by lag, due to server processing issues, client processing issues, or network issues

  
3. source/license

A licensing problem is involved

  
3. source/mod upstream

Problem is upstream (not engine/client)

  
3. source/petz

yet another petz bugz.

  
3. source/testserver

Originates on the testserver, no effect on main yet

  
3. source/unknown

   
3. source/website

Affects the website

  
4. step/approved

Alias has approved this feature, someone should implement it

  
4. step/at work

Being worked on

  
4. step/blocked

we plan to do this, but other work has to be finished first

  
4. step/discussion

issue is under discussion, a solution has not been dictated or agreed upon

  
4. step/help wanted

Need some help

  
4. step/needs confirmation

   
4. step/partially fixed

this is mitigated or partially solved, but more work needs to be done

  
4. step/possible close

Should be closed, but a second opinion is asked

  
4. step/QA main

That's something we can only wait and see whether it hapens again: On the main server

  
4. step/QA NOK

Fix didn't yield the expected results

  
4. step/QA OK

tested

  
4. step/question

More information is needed

  
4. step/ready to deploy

has been QA tested by another person. has no outstanding issues. might be installed on prod, but needs final testing

  
4. step/ready to QA test

the code is supposedly fixed, but needs to be tested.

  
4. step/want approval

Someone can quickly implement this if Alias approves the change/feature

  
5. result/cannot reproduce

   
5. result/duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
5. result/fixed

problem is fixed

  
5. result/maybe

not planned currently, but maybe some day

  
5. result/wontfix

the reported issue won't be changed, whether it's intentional or not.

  
kind/standalone

issues that don't depend on internal access and can be implemented as a stand-alone project

No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/petz
3. source/testserver
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/possible close
4. step/QA main
4. step/QA NOK
4. step/QA OK
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
kind/standalone
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
AliasAlreadyTaken
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: your-land/bugtracker#8658
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?