pups reports: Almost all links on the site " ... #6643
Labels
No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
ugh/petz
ugh/QA main
ugh/QA NOK
ugh/QA OK
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
7 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: your-land/bugtracker#6643
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
pups reports a bug:
Player position:
Player look:
Player information:
Player meta:
Log identifier
Profiler save:
Status:
Teleport command:
Compass command:
Cannot reproduce, for me the links work. Do direct links work?
https://your-land.de/index.php?c=monsters
i also can't reproduce with and without the direct link
I can't reproduce either.
if i use the website's interface to look at the "monsters" page, i have no issue. possibly the player has bookmarked or found outdated URLs. if we can get the url they are looking at, we can (probably) redirect from there to the current URL
If you use an add-blocker it will happen this way like pups wrote.
i use 4 separate layers of ad blocking, i don't have an issue.
however, if i disable javascript for the site, i get this:
with javascript enabled:
if i view the latter with javascript disabled, i can view the individual mob images just fine. so this could possibly be fixed by hard-coding some URL redirects, but i haven't tested everything. that'd be worth doing IMO - if it's still broken sometimes, i recommend enabling javascript. even i can't get away with disabling it by default anymore.
i haven't done a full audit of that monster page, but i notice mimes are absent. i approve of that =D
Maybe they're just well hidden? :P
Maybe the mimic is the "Not all monsters and their variations are shown." text?
So, there are a lot different add-blocker out there... some did (block js), some not. So we are both right.
we are both right. i'm deep in my idiosyncratic protocols, i'm not suggesting you change what you do, just trying to explain what i do do. js blocking is something that i used to do by default, but i don't anymore, mostly because almost nothing retains basic functionality that way anymore. i'm currently trusting my other ad-blocking layers to actually block ads, and they do so, 99.9% of the time. these days, i explicitly disable js on a per-site basis, instead of disabling it by default.