AspireMint reports: Sometimes there are too many v ... #6411
Labels
No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
ugh/petz
ugh/QA main
ugh/QA NOK
ugh/QA OK
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
6 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: your-land/bugtracker#6411
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
AspireMint reports a bug:
Player position:
Player look:
Player information:
Player meta:
Log identifier
Profiler save:
Status:
Teleport command:
Compass command:
We can't control what voice does - only be able to move and adapt.
Out of universe, I think the number is alright for the stone monster troop foci (Scouts, Elites, Fighters) but it's not fine when we're talking about things like Small and Micro foci. Those+eyes in a protection are basically impossible to deal with. I always figured that those were moreso shock troops of Voice and thus would be in smaller numbers.
ya i don't see how voice would have so many smalls/micros - they are not the expendable troops that ones based on stone monster are really... and we've had hundreds of them at times... IDK how we even deal with them, I have never watched from over head, I've never seen a single voice battle - when you're in them, you don't get that big picture or any sort of overview... so any comments from players about these battles - that is our only perspective, even experienced fighters are mostly trying to survive the battle... this whole idea that we can also assess and figure out strategy WHILE trying to survive... hmmm not really going to happen.
I also don't understand why the goal of our struggle should always and everywhere be the destruction of every single enemy. What is this strategy? That's right, none. Our goal should be to protect our cities. Some of them already have voice in them! This is worrying, and not whether hundreds or even thousands of troops appear outside the walls for a short time. That's why I expect a tactical approach instead of blind thrashing. And yes, even during a battle.
this has gone WAY off the rails so here's my two cents over the ACTUAL suggestion
The petz jack-o-lantern grenade stunning troops might seem great on paper, but if you just consistently use them every x seconds, where's the fun? every troop will just be standing there, and considering the grenades are also cheap to make, not in favor unless balancing measures are in place.
edit: small radius doesn't help matters any - still gonna have troops standing around (even the eyes would probably stand still) and when paired with invis, you can just solo a focus without problem. you won't even need to announce it - the battle would be over before anyone can even arrive.
edit 2: general blanket statement, this bug is a suggestion, not a place for yall to talk about voice tactics and what-not. if you want one of those, make one. now I did reconsider everything about the suggestion and I'm still not in favor. heavily not in favor. small radius can be used on things like eyes to render them immobile. consistently spam them enough, and you can kill them without a fight. there's just no fun, y'know?
I seem to have killed this bug from my outrage.
Suggestions like this one are appreciated and all but I just don't see the petz grenade working as essentially a free stun. I mean sure, it would help eventually cut the lag down (much like the now-dead elec sword strategy) but there's still room for improvement.
Of course it is a balancing thing. There are all kinds of knobs and buttons we can use to not let this get out of hand. Would any of these help?
Imagine there was a grenade type weapon that could stun enemies, but only once per enemy, then they learn to adapt.
Imagine there was only a chance to get a monster stunned, with higher (monsterlevel, remaining hitpoints, ... ) $somestat it becomes less likely to get it stunned at all.
Imagine THEY get a stun mechanic, too?
What I really wanted to say is that with the right tactics, we can defeat Voice. While weapons are important, the right tactics are much more important. This includes determining the location and course of the battle yourself, exploiting the terrain, building and using sensible defensive fortifications.
Addendum: the most important thing is good cooperation. This starts with sensible announcements. If they are already without content, I don't even need to draw my sword and leave the field to others who don't want to take the time for communication and consultation. Maybe I'm too harsh in my judgment. Maybe it's because it takes me a little longer to understand the chat. Perhaps.
all of those would be very interesting to see ngl
my point remains valid and solidified
(that took too many tries)