AliasAlreadyTaken reports: Discuss ability to jail onesel ... #5659
Labels
No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
ugh/petz
ugh/QA main
ugh/QA NOK
ugh/QA OK
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
8 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: your-land/bugtracker#5659
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
AliasAlreadyTaken reports a bug:
Player position:
Player look:
Player information:
Player meta:
Log identifier
Profiler save:
Status:
Teleport command:
Compass command:
I am not in favour of being able to go to prison yourself. However, this mechanism could be used to allow players to go to special areas, such as a training ground for specific occasions. If the bailiffs are informed at the same time, they could join in and lead the training.
If we're talking any player can imprison themselves, not in favor. Get the wrong people knowing about it and chat will be flooded with accounts putting themselves in jail. (Hell, on CREATIVE (vf.cash's before it was shut down) mods were constantly putting themselves in jail causing a chat flood and ton of drama over it)
If it's restricted to staff or bailiffs then im vaguely in favor.
No, players will not be able to imprison themselves.
This issues purely deals with the rare case someone who has the jail privs might want to imprison themselves. The question is: Is there a usecase where one might want to imprison oneself?
If the jail will be in the new bailiff office later, I can well imagine that they will also make visits there. Someone should bring bread and water...
No seriously, you could possibly describe them as bailiff signs, which would be an additional way of communicating. Or train replanting on a mini-public farm.
i don't see any reason to "allow" it, but why prevent it?
The question arose when a bailiff tried to quickly jail a spammer who impersonate that very bailiff. In the heat of the moment the bailiff used autocomplete, which targetted himself instead of the spammer.
The question this issue asks is: Does anyone see any legit usecase in which a bailiff or other person with jail privs needs to jail oneself? If there is no such usecase, then I would like to disable "jailing oneself" to prevent accidents.
AliasAlreadyTaken: I see no legit usecase for someone jailing themself.
I am shifting towards neutrality now, unless you are trolling there really isn't a reason to jail yourself.
Testing /jail command in the future but using an alt or another player for that seems way simpler than undoing accidental self jailing 😆
I did sort of jail myself once on another server: a long time ago when i still used the multicrap client, there was a glitch that basically caused me to leak my password on the server, which eventually led me to ban myself until the admin could change my password (and then unban me). However, I think such a scenario should be cosmically rare and if it happens, I think it should be rare enough for you to personally intervene (and anyways we mostly use the PC clients where this shouldn't happen)
Unless crazy circumstances, I see no reason to jail oneself and none of the ultrarare usecases convince me otherwise.
Let's disable self-jailing.