Please stop: snow_leopard has an abortion #5382
Labels
No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
ugh/petz
ugh/QA main
ugh/QA NOK
ugh/QA OK
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
6 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: your-land/bugtracker#5382
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
I don't know why this message comes and why only with the snow leopards. It doesn't happen in normal leopards.
And yes, you can breed snow leopards. That worked for me for a while. And here it is written, behold: https://forum.minetest.net/viewtopic.php?t=22245
Please stop this message.
That has no place in gaming. Wow.
I tried with "fresh" snow leopards again. After three births this message came again.
Four fresh females from the wild all immediately resulted in abortifacient! Have they all had their three births in the wild?
Maybe they had an owner and then had been set free after three births?
I did so with my petz-mare when they were limited to 3 births.
And now I understand what you were talking about yesterday. I did not get that message, so I was quite confused.
Found them far north of Fort Glacier. But, who knows.
the situation seems to be that there was a stillbirth, not an abortion. the message apparently triggered when adding the baby entity to the world failed for some reason. this is most likely the result of our mob spawn limiter discussed in #4142. it seems that instead of initializing a baby with its owner, petz sets the value afterward. this means that to the limiter, the baby is a new mob without an owner, and can be culled.
there's 2 things that need to happen here.
But why is a difference between snow leopard and the normal? Different codes in the same mod?
because snow leopards were added to the spawn limiter while normal leopards weren't. i'm not sure there was a good reason for that, though it might have been influenced by the large number of snow leopards (and polar bears) along the miocene movement route.
Towards the log: As clear and concise as possible with least ambiguity. Towards players: rather something like "Is not pregnant anymore" or some wording that doesn't hint at how cruel nature may be.
👍
oh, i did this and forgot to update the issue:
b6e738ab59
maybe "is not pregnant anymore for unknown reasons", though that's a bit wordy.
It's not nature that's cruel. It's us (or rather, the spawning). Perhaps "could not give birth due to overpopulation in the area and thus forgot beeing pregnant". Or "found no room for a child. This snow leopard has never ever been pregnant. Anything diffrent you might remember has only happened in your imagination. Please move on."