flux reports: new feature request: shared ar ... #374
Labels
No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
ugh/petz
ugh/QA main
ugh/QA NOK
ugh/QA OK
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
5 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: your-land/bugtracker#374
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
flux reports a bug:
Player position:
Player look:
Player information:
Player meta:
Log identifier
Profiler save:
Status:
Im Not 100% Sure but i think Just people added To an area can Open an normal Armor stand which makes it Kind of an shared one
Just tested this, and the unlocked armor stand is 100% usable by anyone.
Having a "protected" armor stand would benefit defenders of a town, they could have some ready armor and whoever is online at the time could take and go fight, then return afterwards.
Will implement.
i could easily add such a thing in yl_commons (or whereever)
That's something 3d_armor in general might benefit from, if the project wasn't stale, I'd probably recommend PR there. What's your opinion?
Regarding armour stands: Not a big fan, they look somewhat aged and don't have a place for the shield, let alone a weapon. Maybe we could abuse NPCs as armor stands. What's @Sokomine 's opinion on that?
i got maybe 50% done in a rewrite of 3d_armor, but stopped to deal w/ more important things. a shared armour stand, and the ability to put shields & other armor on them, was part of that work. another big part of the work was to make it easier to define the behavior when the player experiences various kinds of damage.
The version of 3darmor that I have (slightly outdated perhaps?) already uses an entity that wears the armor stand texture when "empty" and the textures of the armor put on top. So it's already that way.
The model used doesn't seem to support wepaons or shields. It looks like this (made visible by using default_wood.png as "empty" texture. Er. Hope it got added somewhere here.
Changing the model so that it displays the other things requires someone with skill in changing 3d models. It differs a bit from the player model insofar as the arms are not hanging down but are angled a bit. And this is IMHO pretty nice.
A shared version would be very good and ought to be doable with far less work than changing a model (at least from my point of view).
In the long run, clothing would be very nice for NPC to have. Like complex crafted food, clothing could be something that makes NPC happy and more loyal. Players have skins and armor and thus no use or place for it. But NPC do...
upstream PR https://github.com/minetest-mods/3d_armor/pull/127
upstream PR got merged
this is live.