honey can be harvest from petz:beehive even if it is protected #22

Closed
opened 2020-09-18 21:27:52 +00:00 by AliasAlreadyTaken · 13 comments

Reporter: ThinkSome

Reporter: ThinkSome
AliasAlreadyTaken added the
1. kind/bug
label 2020-09-19 22:48:45 +00:00
Owner

Seems like we need locked beehives :P

Seems like we need locked beehives :P
AliasAlreadyTaken added the
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/integration
labels 2020-09-20 20:19:50 +00:00
Owner

Idk why but im actually fine with that.

Idk why but im actually fine with that.
Styxcolor added the
ugh/petz
label 2021-11-16 17:00:26 +00:00
Styxcolor self-assigned this 2022-01-05 07:36:48 +00:00
Styxcolor added this to the (deleted) project 2022-01-05 07:36:50 +00:00
AliasAlreadyTaken was assigned by Styxcolor 2022-01-07 05:30:40 +00:00
Owner

We will test ingame whether the issue still persist and if so try to reach out upstream.

We will test ingame whether the issue still persist and if so try to reach out upstream.
Member

This still persists. Created an upstream issue: https://github.com/runsy/petz/issues/102

If runsy decides that this is intended, we could always add protection on the beehive ourselves if we choose, by overriding on_rightclick.

This still persists. Created an upstream issue: https://github.com/runsy/petz/issues/102 If runsy decides that this is intended, we could always add protection on the beehive ourselves if we choose, by overriding `on_rightclick`.
Member

poked runsy on the upstream issue

poked runsy on the upstream issue
Member

runsy implemented something: a47472e2fb (and 9115576ec7)

runsy implemented something: https://github.com/runsy/petz/commit/a47472e2fb56ed833ca3502aa1fdc758d44d3a4a (and https://github.com/runsy/petz/commit/9115576ec7cf869bb2e8c61d403661c0d37616c0)
AliasAlreadyTaken added this to the 1.1.115 milestone 2022-06-28 22:54:03 +00:00
flux added the
4. step/ready to QA test
label 2022-07-02 17:48:45 +00:00
flux modified the project from (deleted) to flux's TODO list 2022-07-02 23:39:40 +00:00
Member

The proper code is in place, but I forgot to enable the right setting.

Fixed that in 587ed99ec9

The proper code is in place, but I forgot to enable the right setting. Fixed that in https://gitea.your-land.de/your-land/petz/commit/587ed99ec9ee4b13cabe8ec2e31c776d63d0ca54
AliasAlreadyTaken modified the milestone from 1.1.115 to 1.1.116 2022-10-18 01:43:19 +00:00
Author
Owner

Now even as area owner, with areas priv or protection_bypass I can't harvest honey.

Is that a bug or does that only happen on existing beehives? On the testserver there's a beehive near 2188 23 1233 which has honey, but can't be accessed. There are several others in the public farm, but they don't have honey.

Now even as area owner, with areas priv or protection_bypass I can't harvest honey. Is that a bug or does that only happen on existing beehives? On the testserver there's a beehive near 2188 23 1233 which has honey, but can't be accessed. There are several others in the public farm, but they don't have honey.
Member

Now even as area owner, with areas priv or protection_bypass I can't harvest honey.

using the metaphors i've used before, petz beehives have changed from being public to being private. you're asking that they be made protected, but not private.

i'm not sure i want to bother runs w/ refining this, he's mostly concerned w/ how petz work in single-player worlds, so far as i can tell. fixing this can be done w/ a generalized protection API, to allow easily switching between those 3 modes, which has been slowly been getting proposed in various issues.

> Now even as area owner, with areas priv or protection_bypass I can't harvest honey. using the metaphors i've used before, petz beehives have changed from being public to being private. you're asking that they be made protected, but not private. i'm not sure i want to bother runs w/ refining this, he's mostly concerned w/ how petz work in single-player worlds, so far as i can tell. fixing this can be done w/ a generalized protection API, to allow easily switching between those 3 modes, which has been slowly been getting proposed in various issues.
Member

in the meantime, i don't think the issue is a big deal, whether the hive is public or private. the major problem is whether the person who placed the hive has a choice in how it is used.

in the meantime, i don't think the issue is a big deal, whether the hive is public or private. the major problem is whether the person who placed the hive has a choice in how it is used.
Author
Owner
https://gitea.your-land.de/your-land/administration/issues/172
Member

made the beehive protected (not private) in 3f43d5a95c, pending administration#172

made the beehive protected (not private) in https://gitea.your-land.de/your-land/yl_commons/commit/3f43d5a95cda1524d466becc3d25b05b7c49c5a7, pending administration#172
flux added
5. result/fixed
and removed
4. step/ready to QA test
labels 2022-11-13 17:09:38 +00:00
flux removed this from the flux's TODO list project 2022-11-13 17:09:40 +00:00
Styxcolor was unassigned by flux 2022-11-13 17:09:42 +00:00
AliasAlreadyTaken was unassigned by flux 2022-11-13 17:09:42 +00:00
Member

this is live

this is live
flux closed this issue 2022-11-13 17:10:05 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: your-land/bugtracker#22
No description provided.