honey can be harvest from petz:beehive even if it is protected #22
Labels
No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
ugh/petz
ugh/QA main
ugh/QA NOK
ugh/QA OK
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: your-land/bugtracker#22
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Reporter: ThinkSome
Seems like we need locked beehives :P
Idk why but im actually fine with that.
We will test ingame whether the issue still persist and if so try to reach out upstream.
This still persists. Created an upstream issue: https://github.com/runsy/petz/issues/102
If runsy decides that this is intended, we could always add protection on the beehive ourselves if we choose, by overriding
on_rightclick
.poked runsy on the upstream issue
runsy implemented something:
a47472e2fb
(and9115576ec7
)The proper code is in place, but I forgot to enable the right setting.
Fixed that in
587ed99ec9
Now even as area owner, with areas priv or protection_bypass I can't harvest honey.
Is that a bug or does that only happen on existing beehives? On the testserver there's a beehive near 2188 23 1233 which has honey, but can't be accessed. There are several others in the public farm, but they don't have honey.
using the metaphors i've used before, petz beehives have changed from being public to being private. you're asking that they be made protected, but not private.
i'm not sure i want to bother runs w/ refining this, he's mostly concerned w/ how petz work in single-player worlds, so far as i can tell. fixing this can be done w/ a generalized protection API, to allow easily switching between those 3 modes, which has been slowly been getting proposed in various issues.
in the meantime, i don't think the issue is a big deal, whether the hive is public or private. the major problem is whether the person who placed the hive has a choice in how it is used.
your-land/administration#172
made the beehive protected (not private) in
3f43d5a95c
, pending administration#172this is live