Freebie reports: How to change the leader of th ... #1755
Labels
No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
ugh/petz
ugh/QA main
ugh/QA NOK
ugh/QA OK
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: your-land/bugtracker#1755
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Freebie reports a bug:
Player position:
Player look:
Player information:
Player meta:
Log identifier
Profiler save:
Status:
Teleport command:
Compass command:
I don't think there's a way to do this, other than to disband the party and re-form it?
Unfortuately there is no such command. We could try to make one, but even upstream would benefit.
https://github.com/neinwhal/party/issues/1
And? Coder neinwhal said something about a working version there in April.
and they never responded again nor did they release a new version.
Looks like edgy implemented this in
0afca39449
but it was never PRed into upstream.How does it going?
There are several options. We are still waiting for neinwhal. Or we do a PR with the necessary code, which nodial then promised to wave through. Or we can take the only registered fork of MoNTE48 there. https://github.com/MoNTE48/party
He has already built in a lot of things in the applicant's interest. The administrator has been given the additional possibility to reset the leader via command, see init.lua line 242. By the way, from line 677 onwards, further exciting functions will be added.
Have my suggestions above been considered?
Looking at the party mod situation:
Options
Looking at those options it appears that
I'd vote for option 3, until we can make 1 happen
does MoNTE48's fork actually fix anything that's a problem for us? it doesn't seem to fix "underscores as delimiters", nor does it allow changing party owners. in fact, the basic architecture of both forks means that changing the owner is going to be a horribly painful process. also, instead of needing kick/ban privs for certain actions, it requires a new "moderator" priv which it doesn't even create itself.
i vote that we rewrite parties from scratch, and figure out some way to port existing party data to the new mod. but i don't think that's a high priority.