daydream reports: I think Chache's contest shoul ... #4421
Labels
No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
ugh/petz
ugh/QA main
ugh/QA NOK
ugh/QA OK
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: your-land/bugtracker#4421
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
daydream reports a bug:
Player position:
Player look:
Player information:
Player meta:
Log identifier
Profiler save:
Status:
Teleport command:
Compass command:
It's also pretty sad that Alonso doesn't mention the catapult for the builds outside of cities on the vote casting page - just says use the compass.
How is anyone supposed to know where Puerto del Sol's catapult is and not everyone knows how to use a catapult either.
This has been pretty unfair to the submissions that are not inside cities, all around and need to be corrected before next month please.
We can have Alonso mention the catapult - the catapult was done after Alonso was instructed what to say.
However staff cannot interfere in an event a player set up and decided the rules for. We can advise them, but its theirs. Also, changing stuff in a running vote is not a good idea IMO
Imo that is something you should talk directly with Chache with and not on the bugtracker
I think the voting system should be:
Who is 1st?
Who is 2nd?
Who is 3rd?
Three simple questions... do away with these points and to break ties whoever got the most votes for position from the most players.
I did talk to Chache about this but he thought there was a technical reason the NPC couldn't handle this way of voting. He already intends "gold, silver, bronze" type format which 'top 3' is the same as that.
Any point system could be abused or swayed by friendship but like for instance I might want to vote for my own thing in 3rd but I have no way to order it that way in my voting. I dislike the current system so much I'm not even voting cuz I can't get them in my top 3 as intended.