migrate to a more functional git hosting software #3456
Labels
No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
ugh/petz
ugh/QA main
ugh/QA NOK
ugh/QA OK
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: your-land/bugtracker#3456
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally posted by @flux in #3449 (comment)
gitea crashed and deleted a long comment i was typing. curse gitea, this is not the first time its screwed me.
@AliasAlreadyTaken there's lots of other git hosting software, we should pick one and migrate. repo.or.cz is terrible, notabug is terrible, gitlab is better than this, github is microsoft, i don't know much about anything else, but other things exist.
There are a couple of paid ones which are not terrible, but so far I didn't find one that is free and opensource and not terrible.
Plus, gitea is still actively developed on and they have a good history of listening to user requests. So if we can tell them what's wrong, chances are they'll fix it.
gitlab is free and opensource and much more refined, though i admit it's somewhat complicated to install and i find the UI more confusing than most of the others.
to me, the biggest flaws w/ gitea are
there's open issues for at least some of this stuff, but gitea has over 1900 open issues and over 200 open pull requests. and they use github to manage their own project, instead of using gitea itself...
To adress those issues:
Also, do you remember the owncloud/nextcloud drama? Where the owncloud guys made the project a company, then their main dev left in protest and made next cloud? Welll, gitea also wants to go company now and "the community" announced they will fork. Money is not bad per se, but "against the community" is bad.
gitea intends to migrate to their own git provider eventually, it's been discussed over and over and is one of the main IMO not-so-smart decisions the project made.
Same like with Minetest: gitea is far from perfect, but so far its the best I found. If another comes along and the pain with gitea is larger than the pain of moving, we'll do.
hm, i'm using my "permissive" browser, and of course have to have cookies enabled, but it does sound like the problems might be on my end. i'll tweak some settings and see if anything changes.
if we can get a different search backend, that'd be immensely helpful. i'll leave this open for a while, but it sounds like we'll stick w/ gitea.
weird, it's been reasonably responsive for me, when it's working properly.
If we can reproduce, we can tell them. Like "write a comment, then add a label"?
Doesn't mean we shouldn't be open to others.
That may also be a flaw in my expectation