flux reports: re-recreate the reward chest f ... #2689
Labels
No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
ugh/petz
ugh/QA main
ugh/QA NOK
ugh/QA OK
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: your-land/bugtracker#2689
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
flux reports a bug:
Player position:
Player look:
Player information:
Player meta:
Log identifier
Profiler save:
Status:
Teleport command:
Compass command:
i could probably work this out in an hour or less w/ the right prodding
i started this yesterday, but it became more complicated than i had imagined.
non-functional code to come back to later:
https://github.com/fluxionary/minetest-booty_box
basically, this is yet another flux project that died because of formspecs. the concept isn't hard, creating an acceptable UI is harder.
What was/is the
tunnelers' abyss reward chest
exactly?A chest for giving random reward once for each player?
And what's the problem with creating interface?
basically, admins could put stuff into a chest, and every player could take copies of the stuff out of the chest, once.
I guess I'm implementing same thing for this, after all:
#474
(you may still be able to check it out on test serv)
i originally read the descriptions of these issues as distinct, but they aren't really. closing as a duplicate.