your-land/bugtracker
your-land
/
bugtracker
44
20
Code Issues 2.4k Projects 2 Wiki

Silicon exists twofold now #1925

New Issue
Closed
opened 2022-05-15 19:47:34 +00:00 by Diaeresis · 8 comments
Diaeresis commented 2022-05-15 19:47:34 +00:00
Copy Link

Since the last restart mesecons_materials:silicon has become available next to basic_materials:silicon. Most recipes use latter former, making all stock of basic_materials:silicon essentially useless, and some recipes outright impossible to produce since basic_materials:silicon is not craftable anymore.

The items should probably be aliased.

Since the last restart `mesecons_materials:silicon` has become available next to `basic_materials:silicon`. Most recipes use ~~latter~~ **former**, making all stock of `basic_materials:silicon` essentially useless, and some recipes outright impossible to produce since `basic_materials:silicon` is not craftable anymore. The items should probably be aliased.
👍 1
flux added the
1. kind/enhancement
3. source/integration
 labels 2022-05-15 21:18:09 +00:00
Diaeresis commented 2022-05-15 21:46:39 +00:00
Author
Copy Link

I made a mistake in my report, most recipes now use mesecons_materials:silicon. I corrected the text.

I made a mistake in my report, most recipes now use `mesecons_materials:silicon`. I corrected the text.
flux added the
4. step/want approval
 label 2022-05-16 00:20:52 +00:00
flux commented 2022-05-16 00:21:13 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

Alias: i can add an alias (ha ha) if you approve.

Alias: i can add an alias (ha ha) if you approve.
flux commented 2022-05-16 00:22:41 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

Wait.

Mesecons added its own silicon, but still uses basic_materials for its IC? What's the logic in that O_O.

Wait. Mesecons added its own silicon, but still uses basic_materials for its IC? What's the logic in that O_O.
flux commented 2022-05-16 00:23:29 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

oh i guess it's only digistuff that uses that IC

oh i guess it's only digistuff that uses that IC
flux commented 2022-05-16 00:26:40 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

still, there's fools at the helm that're breaking current functionality in the name of "dependency agnosticism". this update seems to be more of that.

still, there's fools at the helm that're breaking current functionality in the name of "dependency agnosticism". this update seems to be more of that.
flux commented 2022-05-16 00:45:09 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

upstream: https://github.com/minetest-mods/mesecons/issues/613

upstream: https://github.com/minetest-mods/mesecons/issues/613
AliasAlreadyTaken added the
4. step/approved
 label 2022-05-16 02:38:47 +00:00
flux removed the
4. step/want approval
 label 2022-05-17 04:18:51 +00:00
flux self-assigned this 2022-05-17 04:20:51 +00:00
flux commented 2022-05-19 21:56:51 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

Created an alias to deal w/ the problem d55f708cfa

Created an alias to deal w/ the problem https://gitea.your-land.de/your-land/yl_commons/commit/d55f708cfaedd457d37a1e5b6c629ab368d660ff
flux added
4. step/ready to QA test
 and removed
4. step/approved
 labels 2022-05-19 21:57:06 +00:00
flux commented 2022-05-22 00:15:38 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

Live! :)

Live! :)
flux closed this issue 2022-05-22 00:15:39 +00:00
flux added
5. result/fixed
 and removed
4. step/ready to QA test
 labels 2022-05-22 00:15:48 +00:00
flux removed their assignment 2022-09-21 00:03:14 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels   
1. kind/balancing

Depends on balancing

  
1. kind/breaking

something that alters or disables an existing game mechanic

  
1. kind/bug

Something is not working

  
1. kind/construction

A build needs fixing

  
1. kind/documentation

Needs proper documentation

  
1. kind/enhancement

New feature

  
1. kind/griefing

players despoiling builds or nature

  
1. kind/invalid

Not a valid report, e.g. created by mistake with no content.

  
1. kind/meme

issue is mostly a joke

  
1. kind/node limit

something which works for or against the node limit

  
1. kind/other

Something not within the other kinds

  
1. kind/protocol

something concerning how staff should react to player requests, or how players should treat each other

  
2. prio/controversial

not likely to happen w/out a lot of discussion

  
2. prio/critical

Very important

  
2. prio/elevated

something players are eager to have fixed

  
2. prio/good first issue

the resolution to this is could be done by a new minetest contributor, who doesn't yet understand the mod ecosystem

  
2. prio/interesting

one of us has real interest in getting this implemented or fixed. however, more research might be needed.

  
2. prio/low

Not so important

  
3. source/art

art needs to be created or found for this to exist. includes sound, 3d modelling, and in-game building.

  
3. source/client

Issue is with the minetest client, or with player client configuration or the technical details of their setup

  
3. source/engine

Issue is due to a bug or feature of the minetest engine

  
3. source/ingame

Problem and solution exist in-game, e.g. builds or player moderation

  
3. source/integration

Two or more nonbuggy mechanics conflict, or our attempts to rectify conflicting mechanics have created a new bug

  
3. source/lag

A problem which is caused or made worse by lag, due to server processing issues, client processing issues, or network issues

  
3. source/license

A licensing problem is involved

  
3. source/mod upstream

Problem is upstream (not engine/client)

  
3. source/unknown

   
3. source/website

Affects the website

  
4. step/approved

Alias has approved this feature, someone should implement it

  
4. step/at work

Being worked on

  
4. step/blocked

we plan to do this, but other work has to be finished first

  
4. step/discussion

issue is under discussion, a solution has not been dictated or agreed upon

  
4. step/help wanted

Need some help

  
4. step/needs confirmation

   
4. step/partially fixed

this is mitigated or partially solved, but more work needs to be done

  
4. step/question

More information is needed

  
4. step/ready to deploy

has been QA tested by another person. has no outstanding issues. might be installed on prod, but needs final testing

  
4. step/ready to QA test

the code is supposedly fixed, but needs to be tested.

  
4. step/want approval

Someone can quickly implement this if Alias approves the change/feature

  
5. result/cannot reproduce

   
5. result/duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
5. result/fixed

problem is fixed

  
5. result/maybe

not planned currently, but maybe some day

  
5. result/wontfix

the reported issue won't be changed, whether it's intentional or not.

  
ugh/petz

yet another petz bugz.

  
ugh/QA main

That's something we can only wait and see whether it hapens again: On the main server

  
ugh/QA NOK

Fix didn't yield the expected results

  
ugh/QA OK

tested

No Label
1. kind/balancing
1. kind/breaking
1. kind/bug
1. kind/construction
1. kind/documentation
1. kind/enhancement
1. kind/griefing
1. kind/invalid
1. kind/meme
1. kind/node limit
1. kind/other
1. kind/protocol
2. prio/controversial
2. prio/critical
2. prio/elevated
2. prio/good first issue
2. prio/interesting
2. prio/low
3. source/art
3. source/client
3. source/engine
3. source/ingame
3. source/integration
3. source/lag
3. source/license
3. source/mod upstream
3. source/unknown
3. source/website
4. step/approved
4. step/at work
4. step/blocked
4. step/discussion
4. step/help wanted
4. step/needs confirmation
4. step/partially fixed
4. step/question
4. step/ready to deploy
4. step/ready to QA test
4. step/want approval
5. result/cannot reproduce
5. result/duplicate
5. result/fixed
5. result/maybe
5. result/wontfix
ugh/petz
ugh/QA main
ugh/QA NOK
ugh/QA OK
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: your-land/bugtracker#1925
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?